29 December 2022

Breaking News
  • High Court issues directives: Legal Aid for Accused should not be for Namesake! Experienced Lawyers should be provided.
  • Facebook prompts new users to use their Name on Aadhaar card
  • Mizo Chiefs Council in SC: Restore our Hereditary Absolute Administrative Control or Rs 500 crore Compensation from Centre
  • Govt . to bring law to guard against the Human Trafficking, Life Imprisonment for Repeat Offenders
  • Yogi Govt. orders withdrawal of 22 year old case against CM Yogi
  • Defective Iphone: Consumer Forum orders Rs 4,000 as Compensation and refund of the cost of phone or Higher Version of Phone to Plaintiff
  • Triple Talaq Bill to be introduced in Lok Sabha on 28th December
  • BCI to examine plea to ban MP’s and MLA’s from Practising as Advocate
  • Mumbai court sets aside summons to Cyrus Mistry in ₹500 crore Defamation case
  • WhatsApp gets Legal notice for ‘middle finger’ emoji, asked to remove within 15 days
Home / Latest News / High Court: Dictation notes taken by Judge’s Steno can’t be shared under RTI, Read Text

High Court: Dictation notes taken by Judge’s Steno can’t be shared under RTI, Read Text


Shorthand notebooks are not to be retained and they cannot be treated as part of judicial record


 Delhi High Court has held that Shorthand note book in which stenographer of a Court takes dictation from the Judge is not a “record” held by a public authority.

Bench ruled that for this reason a copy of it cannot be sought under the Right to Information Act.

Justice Sanjeev Sachdeva observed that the shorthand notebooks are not retained in routine and hence they cannot be treated as part of judicial record. At the most they are only memos of dictation given by a Judge.

Delhi High Court upheld the March 2016 order of Central Information Commission (CIC) whereby petitioner was denied copies of shorthand notes taken in the High Court on May 27, 2013.

The Public Information Officer of the High Court had denied information on the pretext that the shorthand notes are not retained.

The RTI’s first appellate authority also upheld this decision.

As per petitioner, on May 27, 2013 there was a strike by the Bar and no litigant appeared before the court. But on that day a bench of the High Court went on to pass an ex-parte injunction order against them in a suit initiated by a American company.

High Court relied on a full bench judgement of the HC, it is ruled that even a draft judgment signed and exchanged is not to be considered as final judgment.

Such orders are only a tentative view which are liable to be changed and hence there is no question of considering a short hand dictation as Judicial Record, Bench said.

Delhi High Court Judgment on Shorthand Notes Not Covered Under RTI by latest laws team on Scribd

Related News @

5.10.2016 – Central Information Commission: UGC bound to answer RTIs on Edu. Courses recognised by it

9.3.2016 – Right to Information Act will not apply to Appointment of High Court & SC Judges: Modi Govt.

7.3.2016 – CPI(M) pleads to SC: Right to Information Act (RTI) is an undemocratic infringement if applied to Political Parties

24.8.2015- Political parties can Rule the Nation, but can not be questioned under RTI Act, Centre’s stand before Supreme Court

5.2.2016: Can’t reveal names of Exam paper checkers under RTI, says SC (Read Judgment)

Read Laws @

Right to Information Act,2005

Facebook Comments
Previous UN’s World Court rejects a Suit filed against India for Nuclear Arms Race
Next SC to Modi Govt: Change your mindset, don’t dig well when the house is on Fire

Check Also

Govt . to bring law to guard against the Human Trafficking, Life Imprisonment for Repeat Offenders

December 28,2017: While listing out ‘aggravated forms of the trafficking’, Bill speaks of  the offences such as forced labour or the bonded labour by using violence, intimidation, inducement, promise of payment of money, deception or coercion. Government is set to ...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *