Latest laws Helping good people to do good things.

Breaking News

Delhi High Court allows I-T probe in National Herald Case, Sonia & Rahul Gandhi can be in trouble
Supreme Court: Triple Talaq amongst Muslims is worst form of Marriage Dissolution
Govt tells HC: We will not grant sanction to prosecute CM Yogi in decade old 2007 Communal Riots
Is approaching ICJ for stay of Death Sentence in Kulbhushan Jadhav’s Case, India’s Diplomatic failure?
Law Students attack ACP on duty, when caught doing Tripple Riding in no entry area, gets Arrested
Supreme Court’s Triple Talaq Bench coincidentally consists of 5 Judges of 5 different Religious faiths
FIR lodged against Google over search result on PM Modi
Justice Karnan seeks relief from SC, CJI JS Khehar to consider his plea
Supreme Court is in favour of NEET-like All India Test for Selection of Judges
SC convicts Vijay Mallya guilty for Contempt, directs him to appear before Court on July 10

Home / Haryana Victim Compensation Scheme,2013 / Haryana Victim Compensation Scheme,2013 (PDF)

Haryana Victim Compensation Scheme,2013 (PDF)

Facebook Comments

MUKESH & ANR. Vs. STATE OF BIHAR & ORS.

3/4/2017 View PDF View Text

- Appellants are children of Government employees who died in harness. They applied for appointment to Class III Government posts on the basis of instructions governing compassionate appointments -Held, Appellants who were recommended for appointment to Class III or Class IV posts prior to 01.07.2006 will either be appointed on Class III or Class IV posts on regular basis or will be entitled for continuance as Teachers on a regular pay scale.

S.A. BOBDE, L. NAGESWARA RAO

3/4/2017 View PDF View Text

THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP. BY SEC.&ORS Vs. K. BALU & ANR.

31/3/2017 View PDF View Text

- Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Sections 215 and 185.

JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR, D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, L. NAGESWARA RAO

31/3/2017 View PDF View Text

BINOY KUMAR MISHRA Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND AND ANR.

31/3/2017 View PDF View Text

- Mines Act, 1952, Section 23(2) - Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987.

A.K. SIKRI, R.K. AGRAWAL

31/3/2017 View PDF View Text

VINEET KUMAR AND ORS Vs. STATE OF UP & ANR

31/3/2017 View PDF View Text

- Criminal Procedure Code, Section 482 - Indian Penal Code, Section 452, 376(d) and 323 - Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 138 - Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, Section 5(2) - Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, Section 4.

A.K. SIKRI, ASHOK BHUSHAN

31/3/2017 View PDF View Text

THE MAHARASHTRA STATE COOP.HOUSING.FIN.C Vs. PRABHAKAR SITARAM BHADANGE

30/3/2017 View PDF View Text

-Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 - Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Punjab Cooperative Societies Act, 1961, Section 55.

A.K. SIKRI, R.K. AGRAWAL

30/3/2017 View PDF View Text

MANISH JAIN Vs. AKANKSHA JAIN

30/3/2017 View PDF View Text

- A. Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Sections 13(1)(ia) and 24 Protection of Women From Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 23(2) Husband seeking divorce on ground of cruelty - Wife seeking interim maintenance during pendency of proceedings - Wife cannot be refused interim maintenance on the grounds that she was educated lady and professionally qualified and capable of earning handsome income - Wife was not earning anything at the time petition for divorce was filed - Interim maintenance of L 25,000/- granted to wife, which husband was capable to pay from his family business in addition to L 10,000 which wife was getting under Domestic Violence Act - Further held, financial position of wife\'s parents is also immaterial. B. Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Section 24 Maintenance pendente lite and expenses of proceedings - Held, Section, does not use the word \"maintenance\"; but the word \"support\" can be interpreted to mean as to provide for maintenance pendente lite. C. Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Sections 13(1)(ia) and 24 Husband seeking divorce on ground of cruelty - Wife seeking interim maintenance during pendency of proceedings - An order for maintenance pendente lite or for costs of proceedings is conditional on circumstance that wife or husband who makes a claim for same has no independent income sufficient for her or his support or to meet necessary expenses of proceeding.

KURIAN JOSEPH, R. BANUMATHI

30/3/2017 View PDF View Text

SURESH THAKAR Vs. DR. ADITYA PARAKH AND ORS

30/3/2017 View PDF View Text

- Rent Act Matters - Others.

KURIAN JOSEPH, R. BANUMATHI

30/3/2017 View PDF View Text

RANI DUDEJA Vs. STATE OF HARYANA

30/3/2017 View PDF View Text

- Criminal Procedure Code, Section 438.

KURIAN JOSEPH, R. BANUMATHI

30/3/2017 View PDF View Text

GAURI SHANKAR Vs. RAKESH KUMAR AND ORS.

29/3/2017 View PDF View Text

- Ordinary Civil Matter - Others.

DIPAK MISRA, A.M. KHANWILKAR, MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR

29/3/2017 View PDF View Text

RAGHUBIR SINGH BISHT(D) TR.LRS.& ANR. Vs. DR. RAGHUNATH SINGH NEGI & ORS.

29/3/2017 View PDF View Text

- Rent Act Matters - Others.

KURIAN JOSEPH, R. BANUMATHI

29/3/2017 View PDF View Text

Latest CaseLaw

Haryana Victim Compensation Scheme,2013 (PDF)

Leave a Reply Cancel reply