Home / articles / How Judges should comply Section 437 A CrPC? by Rakesh Kumar Singh

How Judges should comply Section 437 A CrPC? by Rakesh Kumar Singh

November 2, 2017 articles Leave a comment 2,252 Views

How Judges should comply Section 437 A CrPC? by Rakesh Kumar Singh (Downloadable PDF)

How Judges should comply Section 437 A CrPC? by Rakesh Kumar Singh by Latest Laws Team on Scribd

Bonds under Section 437 A CrPC

Facebook Comments

Tags Article Bail Bond Court CrPC Section 437A CrPC

Check Also

Possession of Stolen Mobile would not amount to commission of offence u/s 411 IPC by Rakesh Kumar Singh

HALAPPA Vs. MALIK SAB

15/12/2017 View PDF View Text

A. Motor Vehicle Act, 1988, Section 166 - 100% permanent disability - Compensation - Case of insurer that he visited to attend event - A demonstration of tractors was being held by tractor\'s company - Insured who is agriculturist, when approached tractor, driver unable to bring it to a halt as a result of which it turned turtle and collided with insured resulting in grievous injuries - Held, insurer failed to produce either file or report of Investigator in case - No independent witness produced by insurer to displace version of incident as deposed to by insured and eye witness - Insurer liable for compensation. B. Motor Vehicle Act, 1988, Section 166 - 100% permanent disability - Compensation - Enhancement - Medical evidence shows that lower limbs of insurer paralyzed resulting in a loss of bladder and bowel control - Medical evidence establishes 100% disability of insurer - Insurer suffers from traumatic paraplegia and was hospitalized for 42 days - Insurer was 28 years of age when accident took place - Thus, monthly income of insurer L 4,000/- - Award for Future prospects and deduction for present expenses, enhanced from L 5,75,000/- to L 7,75,000/- - Award for future medical expenses enhanced from L 30,000/- to L 1,20,000/- regard to nature of disability - Therefore, compensation enhanced by L 2,70,000/- at the rate of 7% interest.

Dipak Misra, CJI, A.M. Khanwilkar and Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, JJ.

15/12/2017 View PDF View Text

RAJ KUMAR BHATIA Vs. SUBHASH CHANDER BHATIA

15/12/2017 View PDF View Text

Consumer Fora - Implementation of proper infrastructure - Committee appointed by present Court has filed its report - Committee has completed its task - Work of three member Committee appointed stands concluded with its report, a copy of which placed on record - Committee stands closed - ASG to assist present Court in formulating appropriate directions to ensure that proper infrastructure made available at all levels of consumer fora across country.

Dipak Misra, CJI, A.M. Khanwilkar and Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, JJ.

15/12/2017 View PDF View Text

TEESTA ATUL SETALVAD Vs. THE STATE OF GUJARAT

15/12/2017 View PDF View Text

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 102 - Indian Penal Code, Sections 406, 420 and 120B - Information Technology Act, 2000, Section 72A - Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 1976, appeal dismissed.

Dipak Misra, CJI. and A.M. Khanwilkar, J.

15/12/2017 View PDF View Text

DINESH KUMAR J. @ DINESH J, Vs. NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD

15/12/2017 View PDF View Text

Ordinary Civil Matter, appeal is allowed.

Dipak Misra, CJI, A.M. Khanwilkar and Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, JJ.

15/12/2017 View PDF View Text

HARPAL SINGH Vs. ASHOK KUMAR

15/12/2017 View PDF View Text

Constitution of India, Article 227 - Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954, Section 185 (1) - Specific Relief Act, Section 6, appeal is dismissed.

Dipak Misra, CJI, A.M. Khanwilkar and Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, JJ.

15/12/2017 View PDF View Text

RAJIVE RATURI Vs. UNION OF INDIA

15/12/2017 View PDF View Text

Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 - Companies Act, 2013, Section 2 - Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation Act) 1995.

A.K. Sikri and Ashok Bhushan, JJ.

15/12/2017 View PDF View Text

DISABLED RIGHT GROUP Vs. UNION OF INDIA

15/12/2017 View PDF View Text

Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation Act) 1995, Section 39 - Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016, Section 32 - Rights of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009.

A.K. Sikri and Ashok Bhushan, JJ.

15/12/2017 View PDF View Text

M.C.MEHTA Vs. UNION OF INDIA

15/12/2017 View PDF View Text

Delhi Laws (Special Provisions) Act, 2006.

Madan B. Lokur and Deepak Gupta, JJ.

15/12/2017 View PDF View Text

JOSEPH Vs. STATE REP. BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE

14/12/2017 View PDF View Text

Indian Penal Code, Section 302 read with Section 149, appeals are partly allowed.

Ranjan Gogoi and R. Banumathi, JJ.

14/12/2017 View PDF View Text

LMJ INTERNATIONAL LTD. Vs. DANKUNI STEELS LIMITED

14/12/2017 View PDF View Text

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Section 9, appeal is allowed.

A.K. Sikri and Ashok Bhushan, JJ.

14/12/2017 View PDF View Text

Latest CaseLaw

Latest laws Helping good people to do good things.

Friday

5 January 2018

How Judges should comply Section 437 A CrPC? by Rakesh Kumar Singh

You May Also Like

Check Also

Possession of Stolen Mobile would not amount to commission of offence u/s 411 IPC by Rakesh Kumar Singh

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

How Judges should comply Section 437 A CrPC? by Rakesh Kumar Singh

You May Also Like

Section 305 CrPC: Dealing with Offences Committed by Companies and Trials by Rakesh Kumar Singh

Scope and Power of Court to Seek Bond under Section 88 CrPC by Rakesh Kumar Singh

Cognizance and Criminal Trial under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 by Rakesh Kumar Singh

Check Also

Possession of Stolen Mobile would not amount to commission of offence u/s 411 IPC by Rakesh Kumar Singh

Leave a Reply Cancel reply