Home / Judiciary / Judicial Service Exams / Judicial Services Exam Question Papers

Judicial Services Exam Question Papers

Andhra Pradesh Judicial Service
Assam Judicial Service
Bihar Judicial Service
Chhattisgarh Judicial Service
Delhi Judicial Service
Haryana Judicial Service
Jharkhand Judicial Service
Kerala Judicial Service
Madhya Pradesh Judicial Service
Maharashtra Judicial Service
Odisha Judicial Service
Rajasthan Judicial Service
Uttar Pradesh Judicial Service
Uttrakhand Judicial Service

Facebook Comments

3 comments

Ashish Goswami
July 3, 2015 at 5:16 am

Hello Good people…

You guys actually are GOOD PEOPLE I must say. I really admire your sincere & focussed work. Material on the site is informative, succint & genuine. A suggestion is that if possible please also provide the answers of the judicial papers which you post on your site.

Lots of wishes…

Keep it up..

Ashish Goswami

(Advocate)

Reply
- Ritika Sachdeva
  July 7, 2015 at 4:53 am
  
  Yes, I am totally agree with Mr Ashish Goswami. You guys are tremendous. Moreover Mr Ashish has righty described & defined your efforts…Keep it Up!
  
  Reply
- Neha
  May 27, 2017 at 12:32 pm
  
  I second you on this sir. Your work is really really appreciated!
  
  Reply

STATE BANK OF INDIA AND ORS. Vs. B.R.SAINI

15/12/2018 View PDF View Text

A. Constitution of India, 1950 Article 311(2) State Bank of India Officers Service Rules, 68(2)(ii) - Government servants as well as others are governed by service rules and that whenever an Inquiry is conducted and a punishment is awarded, a delinquent employee is entitled to a copy of Report of the Inquiring Authority and an opportunity to submit his explanation - Absence of any rule providing for an opportunity to be given to a delinquent employee before imposition of a penalty cannot be taken advantage of by the employer - However, there is no requirement of a second show cause notice before imposition of a penalty. B. Constitution of India, 1950 Article 311(2) State Bank of India Officers Service Rules, 68(2)(ii) - Major Penalty - Respondent given opportunity to respond to the Report of the Inquiring Authority and to the findings of the Disciplinary Authority - Respondent not entitled to any further notice before imposition of a penalty.

S.A. Bobde and L. Nageswara Rao, JJ.

15/12/2018 View PDF View Text

HALAPPA Vs. MALIK SAB

15/12/2017 View PDF View Text

A. Motor Vehicle Act, 1988, Section 166 - 100% permanent disability - Compensation - Case of insurer that he visited to attend event - A demonstration of tractors was being held by tractor\'s company - Insured who is agriculturist, when approached tractor, driver unable to bring it to a halt as a result of which it turned turtle and collided with insured resulting in grievous injuries - Held, insurer failed to produce either file or report of Investigator in case - No independent witness produced by insurer to displace version of incident as deposed to by insured and eye witness - Insurer liable for compensation. B. Motor Vehicle Act, 1988, Section 166 - 100% permanent disability - Compensation - Enhancement - Medical evidence shows that lower limbs of insurer paralyzed resulting in a loss of bladder and bowel control - Medical evidence establishes 100% disability of insurer - Insurer suffers from traumatic paraplegia and was hospitalized for 42 days - Insurer was 28 years of age when accident took place - Thus, monthly income of insurer L 4,000/- - Award for Future prospects and deduction for present expenses, enhanced from L 5,75,000/- to L 7,75,000/- - Award for future medical expenses enhanced from L 30,000/- to L 1,20,000/- regard to nature of disability - Therefore, compensation enhanced by L 2,70,000/- at the rate of 7% interest.

Dipak Misra, CJI, A.M. Khanwilkar and Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, JJ.

15/12/2017 View PDF View Text

RAJ KUMAR BHATIA Vs. SUBHASH CHANDER BHATIA

15/12/2017 View PDF View Text

Consumer Fora - Implementation of proper infrastructure - Committee appointed by present Court has filed its report - Committee has completed its task - Work of three member Committee appointed stands concluded with its report, a copy of which placed on record - Committee stands closed - ASG to assist present Court in formulating appropriate directions to ensure that proper infrastructure made available at all levels of consumer fora across country.

Dipak Misra, CJI, A.M. Khanwilkar and Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, JJ.

15/12/2017 View PDF View Text

TEESTA ATUL SETALVAD Vs. THE STATE OF GUJARAT

15/12/2017 View PDF View Text

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 102 - Indian Penal Code, Sections 406, 420 and 120B - Information Technology Act, 2000, Section 72A - Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 1976, appeal dismissed.

Dipak Misra, CJI. and A.M. Khanwilkar, J.

15/12/2017 View PDF View Text

DINESH KUMAR J. @ DINESH J, Vs. NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD

15/12/2017 View PDF View Text

Ordinary Civil Matter, appeal is allowed.

Dipak Misra, CJI, A.M. Khanwilkar and Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, JJ.

15/12/2017 View PDF View Text

HARPAL SINGH Vs. ASHOK KUMAR

15/12/2017 View PDF View Text

Constitution of India, Article 227 - Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954, Section 185 (1) - Specific Relief Act, Section 6, appeal is dismissed.

Dipak Misra, CJI, A.M. Khanwilkar and Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, JJ.

15/12/2017 View PDF View Text

RAJIVE RATURI Vs. UNION OF INDIA

15/12/2017 View PDF View Text

Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 - Companies Act, 2013, Section 2 - Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation Act) 1995.

A.K. Sikri and Ashok Bhushan, JJ.

15/12/2017 View PDF View Text

DISABLED RIGHT GROUP Vs. UNION OF INDIA

15/12/2017 View PDF View Text

Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation Act) 1995, Section 39 - Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016, Section 32 - Rights of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009.

A.K. Sikri and Ashok Bhushan, JJ.

15/12/2017 View PDF View Text

M.C.MEHTA Vs. UNION OF INDIA

15/12/2017 View PDF View Text

Delhi Laws (Special Provisions) Act, 2006.

Madan B. Lokur and Deepak Gupta, JJ.

15/12/2017 View PDF View Text

VIJENDRA KUMAR AND ORS. Vs. THE COMMISSIONER A.P. CHARITABLE AND RELIGIOUS INSTITUTION AND ENDOWMENT DEPARTMENT

15/12/2017 View PDF View Text

Andhra Pradesh Hindu Charitable and Religious Institutions and Endowment Act, 1966, Section 77 - Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Section 114(e). The appeal is thus, allowed in these terms. No costs.

N.V. Ramana and Amitava Roy, JJ.

15/12/2017 View PDF View Text

Latest CaseLaw

Andhra Pradesh Judicial Service
Assam Judicial Service
Bihar Judicial Service
Chhattisgarh Judicial Service
Delhi Judicial Service
Haryana Judicial Service
Jharkhand Judicial Service
Kerala Judicial Service
Madhya Pradesh Judicial Service
Maharashtra Judicial Service
Odisha Judicial Service
Rajasthan Judicial Service
Uttar Pradesh Judicial Service
Uttrakhand Judicial Service

Latest laws Helping good people to do good things.

Monday

15 January 2018

Judicial Services Exam Question Papers

3 comments

Leave a Reply Cancel reply