Breaking News
  • Supreme Court: Can’t pass orders to search missing articles in museums
  • HC accepts BJP’s Petition against Election Com. & Ahmed Patel of Congress for his RS win
  • Criminal investigation launched against oldest Hindu temple in Singapore
  • Blue whale Challenge: Delhi High Court seeks response from Facebook, Google & Yahoo to remove links of the game
  • SC strikes down Triple Talaq being unconstitutional, paves way for Uniform Civil Code, Read Text
  • Centre urges SC to not to Ban sale of BS-IV vehicles once BS-VI comes into force in 2020
  • Election Commission asks Law Ministry: Can we allow PIOs to campaign in Indian polls
  • Will Triple Talaq verdict tomorrow, be parting shot of CJI Khehar
  • Lt. Colonel Purohit, accused in Malegaon Blast, Granted Bail by the Supreme Court
  • Unbelievable: Saudi Man Divorces Wife just for walking ahead of him
Home / Latest News / US Courts orders Johnson & Johnson to pay Compensation after its Powder gives Woman Ovarian Cancer

US Courts orders Johnson & Johnson to pay Compensation after its Powder gives Woman Ovarian Cancer

May,6,2017:

Victim used J&J’s baby powder for more than 40 years before her diagnosis with ovarian cancer in 2012.

Johnson & Johnson caused Cancer

A verdict in the Missouri awarded $US5.4 million in compensatory damages to a woman in Virginia and expounded that  J & J was 99 per cent at fault as woman developed cancer after four decades of daily use of the talc-containing products produced by J & J, specifically well-known Johnson’s Baby Powder and the Shower to Shower Powder.

Johnson & Johnson was ordered by the St. Louis jury to pay more than $110 million to Virginia woman who blamed her ovarian cancer on the company’s talcum products.

Imerys Talc America, which provided the talc to the J&J, was ordered by the jury to pay about $100,000. Imerys Talc is a unit of the Paris-based Imerys SA.

Plaintiff Lois Slemp, 62, stated that she used the J&J’s baby powder for more than 40 years before her diagnosis with the ovarian cancer in the year 2012. J&J sold its Shower to Shower brand in the year 2012.

 

While the US FDA encourages the manufacturers to remove 1,4-dioxane, it is not required by the federal law.

Earlier this month, US Senators Charles Schumer and Kirsten Gillibrand called on US FDA to ban it, saying it doesn’t have a real purpose in the cosmetics.

US Senators Charles Schumer  added that,’The fact that the 1,4-dioxane, a potentially dangerous chemical, is hiding out in everyday products expected to make us clean is very disturbing, and to make matters worse, the likely carcinogens like this one can be even more harmful to the kids’.

Number of companies have agreed to stop using the 1,4-dioxane including the Johnson & Johnson, which reformulated its baby bath products in the year 2014.

Related News @ LatestLaws.com-

3.5.2016 – USA Jury Orders Johnson & Johnson to Pay $55 Million Compensation in Baby-Powder Cancer Suit

Facebook Comments
Cancer Johnson & Johnson

Check Also

SC strikes down Triple Talaq being unconstitutional, paves way for Uniform Civil Code, Read Text

SC strikes down Triple Talaq being unconstitutional, paves way for Uniform Civil Code, Read Text

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *